research methodology

I’m studying and need help with a Health & Medical question to help me learn.

 

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.

 

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

A. Develop an introduction (suggested length of 4-6 pages) for your capstone in which you do the following:

1. Describe your chosen topic within the field of HIM.

2. Explain why you chose the topic.

3. Explain why you chose your research methodology (e.g., case study, meta-analysis of data).

4. Discuss why the topic is important to the field of HIM.

B. Explain the problem (suggested length of 3–5 pages) within the field of HIM your project will address by doing the following:

Note: You may choose to refer to your sources to support your explanations.

1. Explain the problem related to your selected topic.

2. Describe background information about the problem.

3. Discuss possible causes of the problem.

4. Explain why an examination of this problem is important to the field of HIM.

C. Create a literature review by doing the following:

1. Summarize 10–15 professional sources relevant to the topic you have chosen.

2. Explain how each of the professional sources applies to the topic being investigated

3. Explain how all 10-15 sources collectively support the chosen topic.

Note: If you are referencing a source as current, it should be no older than three years.

D. Submit an email containing the completed Human Subjects FAQ Quiz, which demonstrates that you have read and understood the “Human Subjects FAQ.”

Note: Contact your course instructor if you have any questions about where to find these.

E. Assess whether the capstone proposal complies with the Institutional Review Board (IRB) standards for exemption status.

Note: If you would like your proposed project to have an IRB review, make those arrangements with your course instructor and the IRB.

F. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

G. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.RUBRIC


A1. TOPIC:

NOT EVIDENT

A description is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission does not logically describe the topic, or the topic is not relevant to the field of HIM.

COMPETENT

The submission logically describes the topic, and the topic is relevant to the field of HIM.

A2. TOPIC CHOICE:

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation is not in narrative format or does not logically address why the topic was chosen.

COMPETENT

The explanation is in narrative format and logically addresses why the topic was chosen.

A3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation is not in narrative format or does not logically address why the research methodology was chosen.

COMPETENT

The explanation is in narrative format and logically addresses why the research methodology was chosen.

A4. TOPIC IMPORTANCE:

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of the topic is not in narrative format or does not provide a logical and relevant discussion about why the chosen topic is important to the field of HIM.

COMPETENT

The discussion of the topic is in narrative format and provides a logical and relevant discussion about why the chosen topic is important to the field of HIM.

B1. PROBLEM:

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation is not in narrative form or it does not address how the problem relates to the selected topic. Or the problem is a generic healthcare problem that is not specific to the field of HIM.

COMPETENT

The explanation is in narrative format and addresses how the problem relates to the selected topic. The problem is specific to the field of HIM.

B2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

NOT EVIDENT

A description is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description of the background information about the problem is not in narrative format or is not relevant to the field of HIM. Or the description is not supported by at least 2 outside sources.

COMPETENT

The description of the background information about the problem is in narrative format, is relevant to the field of HIM, and is supported by 2 or more outside sources.

B3. PROBLEM CAUSES:

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion is not in narrative format or does not logically address possible causes of the problem. Or the possible causes of the problem are not supported by at least 2 outside sources.

COMPETENT

The discussion is in narrative format, logically addresses possible causes of the problem, and the possible causes of the problem are supported by 2 or more outside sources.

B4. PROBLEM EXAMINATION PROCESS:

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation is not in narrative format or it does not logically address why examining the problem is important to the field of HIM.

COMPETENT

The explanation is in narrative format and logically addresses why examining the problem is important to the field of HIM.

C1. PROFESSIONAL SOURCES:

NOT EVIDENT

A summary of each of the 10–15 sources is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The summary of any source is not in narrative format, or any source is not appropriate for professionally supporting the chosen topic.

COMPETENT

The summary of each of the 10–15 sources is in narrative format and professionally supports the chosen topic.

C2. LITERATURE APPLICATION:

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of each of the 10–15 professional sources is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation of any professional source is not in narrative format or does not logically explain how the source applies to the topic being investigated.

COMPETENT

The explanation of each of the 10–15 professional sources is in narrative format and logically explains how the source applies to the topic being investigated.

C3. EXPLANATION OF SOURCES:

NOT EVIDENT

A explanation is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation of the professional sources does not logically address how the sources collectively support the chosen topic, or not all of the professional sources are included in the explanation.

COMPETENT

The explanation of all the professional sources logically addresses how the sources collectively support the chosen topic.

D. HUMAN SUBJECTS FAQ:

NOT EVIDENT

The Human Subjects FAQ Quiz is not submitted.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The Human Subjects FAQ Quiz is submitted, but it is not complete.

COMPETENT

The Human Subjects FAQ Quiz is submitted and complete.

E. IRB COMPLIANCE:

NOT EVIDENT

The capstone proposal does not comply with IRB standards for exemption status due to using WGU data, including human subjects, involving research that poses greater than minimal risk to human subjects, dealing with vulnerable populations or relations, gathering data on sensitive topics, gathering data in atypical ways, or failing to meet other human subjects’ protection criteria.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Not applicable

COMPETENT

The capstone proposal complies with IRB standards for exemption status by not using WGU data, not including human subjects, not involving research that poses greater than minimal risk to human subjects, not dealing with vulnerable populations or relations, not gathering data on sensitive topics, not gathering data in atypical ways, and meeting other human subjects’ protection criteria. Or the capstone project has IRB approval.

F. APA SOURCES:

NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style.

COMPETENT

The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.

G. PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION:

NOT EVIDENT

Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.

COMPETENT

Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount