1. Conduct a case analysis using the IRAC method. Select one of the following cases to analyze:
    • A.B. &.S. Auto Service, Inc. v South Shore Bank of Chicago.
    • Leonard v PepsiCo
    • C9 Ventures v SVC-West, L.P.
    • Home Basket Co., LLC. v Pampered Chef, Ltd.
  2. Research the case using Belhaven’s library database and the internet. Use the IRAC method to conduct a case analysis.
    • State the Issue
      • What is the legal question that, when answered, determines the legal result of the case? Who are the parties disputing and what do they want the court to decide?
      • The issue should be stated in the form of a question in a specific, rather than a general form.
      • If there is more than one issue to address, then you must write a separate IRAC analysis for each issue.
    • Identify the Rule
      • What law or test applies to the issue?
      • The rule should be stated as a general principle and not a conclusion to the particular case.
    • Conduct an Analysis
      • Apply the rule to the facts of the case. What are the relevant facts given the rule of the law?
      • Use the facts to explain how the rule leads to the conclusion. How does the court interpret the rule?
      • Discuss both sides to the case.
    • State the Conclusion
      • The conclusion should be stated in one or two sentences. The rationale should not be longer than a paragraph.
      • Do you agree with the courts’ rulings thus far? Explain your answer.
  3. Answer the following questions.
    • If you were the judge in this case, how would you rule? Provide the rationale for your answer.
    • What makes this case significant?

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount